ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Cardiac transplantation in controlled donation after circulatory death: a meta-analysis of long-term survival using reconstructed time-to-event data.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- cDCDD and Heart Procurement: Challenges from a French Critical Care Perspective.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) allografts made up a small fraction of donor hearts available for transplant, however it is estimated this could increase to 30% in future years. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe the largest and most up-to-date short- and long-term survival outcomes for cDCD cardiac transplantation. Methods: Three electronic databases were selected to complete the initial literature search from inception of records until February 2024. Primary outcomes were short-term survival at 12 months, as well as long-term time-to-event survival data. These data were calculated using aggregated Kaplan-Meier curves according to established methods. The secondary outcomes were acute rejection and primary graft dysfunction. Results: Following the PRISMA screening protocol, ten studies were included for analysis, eight of which were published in the last 12 months. A pooled cohort of 1,219 donor/recipient pairs were analyzed, of which all had graphical extraction of individual patient data to reveal an aggregated Kaplan-Meier curve. The survival estimates at 1, 3 and 5 years for the pooled cDCD cohort were 92.4%, 85.3% and 85.3%, respectively. In-hospital mortality rates were low at just 2.5%. Conclusions: While only making up a small percentage of current heart transplant figures, cDCD allografts may not only significantly reduce waitlist times, but could also increase the donor pool, and improve survivability over current procurement techniques. Ultimately, cDCD allografts show promise in offering an effective and favorable procurement source for cardiac transplantation worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.