Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944492›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Mapping the landscape and research trend of imaging diagnosis in lymphoma: a bibliometric analysis from 1976 to 2024.

Yi Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yi MaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Puren Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over the past five decades, extensive research has been conducted on lymphoma imaging diagnostics; however, no bibliometric analysis has been performed in this area. Therefore, we undertook a bibliometric analysis to clarify the progress and current state of research in this field. Methods: We conducted a search of the Web of Science Core Collection database for articles related to imaging diagnosis and lymphoma, focusing exclusively on English-language publications up to June 20, 2024. We analyzed and visualized various aspects, including publication trends, journals, co-authorship networks, countries, institutions, and keywords. To examine research trends in this field, we utilized bibliometric analysis tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R4.3.3. Results: From 1976 to 2024, a total of 10,410 publications were produced on this topic, with 2021 marking the peak in publication numbers. The most significant contributions in this research area were found in the fields of Conclusion: This study presented a bibliometric analysis of lymphoma imaging diagnosis, highlight showcasing research trends, influential significant studies, and collaborative networks. The analysis identified key contributions to the field and provide insights for future research directions.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisCTimaging diagnosislymphomaMR

Identifiers

PMID39944492
PMCPMC11813927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.