Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Diagnostics of lung cancer by fragmentated blood circulating cell-free DNA based on machine learning methods.

Ivan O Meshkov, Alexander P Koturgin, Pavel V Ershov, Liubov A Safonova, Julia A Remizova, Valentina V Maksyutina, Ekaterina D Maralova, Vasilisa A Astafieva, Alexey A Ivashechkin, Boris D Ignatiev and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ivan O MeshkovFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Alexander P KoturginFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Pavel V ErshovFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Liubov A SafonovaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Julia A RemizovaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Valentina V MaksyutinaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina D MaralovaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Vasilisa A AstafievaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Alexey A IvashechkinFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Boris D IgnatievFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Antonida V MakhotenkoFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina A SnigirFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Valentin V MakarovFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir S YudinFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Anton A KeskinovFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Sergey M YudinFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Anna S MakarovaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks" of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (Centre for Strategic Planning, of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency), Moscow, Russia.
Veronika I SkvortsovaThe Federal Medical and Biological Agency (FMBA of Russia), Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive diagnostics based on liquid biopsy makes it possible early detection of lung cancer (LC). The blood plasma circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments reflect the genome and chromatin status and are considered as integral cancer biomarkers and the biological entities for 'cancer-of-origin' prediction. The aim of this work is to create a method for processing next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and an interpretable binary classification model (CM), which analyzed cfDNA fragmentation features for distinguishing healthy subjects and subjects with LC. Methods: 148 healthy subjects and 138 subjects with LC were included in the study. cfDNA fractions, isolated from blood plasma biospecimens, were used for DNA libraries preparations and NGS on the NovaSeq 6,000 Illumina system with a coverage of 100 million reads/sample. Twelve variables, describing the abundance and length distribution of cfDNA fragments within each genomic interval, and 40 variables based on the values of position-weight matrices, describing combinations of 5-bp-long terminal motifs of cfDNA fragments, were used to characterize genomic fragmentation. Classification models of the first phase of machine learning were based either on logistic regression with L1- and L2-regularization or were probabilistic CMs based on Gaussian processes. The second phase CM was based on kernel logistic regression. Results: The final CM can distinguish healthy subjects and subjects with LC with AUC values of 0.872-0.875. The performance of developed CM was evaluated using datum and testing sets for each LC stage category. Sensitivity values ranged from 66.7 to 85.7%, from 77.8 to 100%, and from 70 to 80% for LC stages I, II, and III, respectively. Specificity values ranged from 79.3 to 90.0%. Discussion: Thus, the CM has a good diagnostic value and does not require clinical or other data on tumor-associated biomarkers. The current method for LC detection has some advantages for future clinical implementation as a decision-making support system due to the performance of the CM requires data exclusively from NGS-analysis of blood plasma cfDNA fragmentation; the accuracy of the CM does not depend on any additional clinical data; the CM is highly interpretable and traceable; CM has appropriate modular architecture.

Indexed as

cancer early detectioncfDNAcirculating cell-free DNAdiagnostic classification modelfragmentomelung cancermachine learning methods

Identifiers

PMID39944482
PMCPMC11813899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.