ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Diagnostics of lung cancer by fragmentated blood circulating cell-free DNA based on machine learning methods.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Brain Metastasis With Liquid Biopsy: Biomarkers and Technologies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on blood routine tests and tumor markers in early screening of primary bronchogenic lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Cost-effective shallow genome-wide sequencing for profiling plasma cfDNA signatures to enhance lung cancer detection.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive diagnostics based on liquid biopsy makes it possible early detection of lung cancer (LC). The blood plasma circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments reflect the genome and chromatin status and are considered as integral cancer biomarkers and the biological entities for 'cancer-of-origin' prediction. The aim of this work is to create a method for processing next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and an interpretable binary classification model (CM), which analyzed cfDNA fragmentation features for distinguishing healthy subjects and subjects with LC. Methods: 148 healthy subjects and 138 subjects with LC were included in the study. cfDNA fractions, isolated from blood plasma biospecimens, were used for DNA libraries preparations and NGS on the NovaSeq 6,000 Illumina system with a coverage of 100 million reads/sample. Twelve variables, describing the abundance and length distribution of cfDNA fragments within each genomic interval, and 40 variables based on the values of position-weight matrices, describing combinations of 5-bp-long terminal motifs of cfDNA fragments, were used to characterize genomic fragmentation. Classification models of the first phase of machine learning were based either on logistic regression with L1- and L2-regularization or were probabilistic CMs based on Gaussian processes. The second phase CM was based on kernel logistic regression. Results: The final CM can distinguish healthy subjects and subjects with LC with AUC values of 0.872-0.875. The performance of developed CM was evaluated using datum and testing sets for each LC stage category. Sensitivity values ranged from 66.7 to 85.7%, from 77.8 to 100%, and from 70 to 80% for LC stages I, II, and III, respectively. Specificity values ranged from 79.3 to 90.0%. Discussion: Thus, the CM has a good diagnostic value and does not require clinical or other data on tumor-associated biomarkers. The current method for LC detection has some advantages for future clinical implementation as a decision-making support system due to the performance of the CM requires data exclusively from NGS-analysis of blood plasma cfDNA fragmentation; the accuracy of the CM does not depend on any additional clinical data; the CM is highly interpretable and traceable; CM has appropriate modular architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.