Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944475›Full record

ArticleQuantitative plant biology2025

The Turing heritage for plant biology: all spots and stripes?

Eric Siero, Eva E Deinum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Impact factor: Playing a number on you.Quantitative plant biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric SieroMathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris), Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, 6708PB, The Netherlands.
Eva E DeinumMathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris), Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, 6708PB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-200X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 'The chemical basis of morphogenesis' (1952), Alan Turing introduced an idea that revolutionised our thinking about pattern formation. He proposed that diffusion could lead to the spontaneous formation of regular patterns. Here, we discuss the impact of Turing's idea on plant science using three well-established examples at different scales: ROP patterning inside single cells, epidermal patterning across several cells and whole vegetation patterns. Also at intermediate levels, e.g., organ spacing, plants look surprisingly regular. But not all regular patterns are Turing patterns, careful observation and prediction of the patterning process-not just the final pattern-is critical to distinguish between mechanisms.

Indexed as

dryland vegetation patternsepidermal tissuespattern formationphyllotaxisRho-of-Plants

Identifiers

PMID39944475
PMCPMC11811860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.