ReviewCureus2025
Association of Vitamin D Deficiency as an Independent Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction and Its Therapeutic Implications: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Case-Control Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Updated perspectives on vitamin D deficiency, screening, supplementation and clinical guidance.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Vitamin D in Cardiovascular Medicine: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency is a highly prevalent condition globally and has emerged as a significant risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). Although its role in the regulation of phospho-calcic metabolism is well established, its involvement in the evolution of myocardial infarction (MI) is yet to be fully understood. Vitamin D deficiency is a manageable condition, and a reasonable time to assess and commence treatment is crucial, as the patient presents with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This article discusses the various mechanisms through which vitamin D may prevent MI, including its role in the development of atherosclerosis, as well as its cardioprotective effects. Cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle have exhibited the presence of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) on the surface. Vitamin D deficiency also plays a crucial role in upregulating inflammatory cytokines and activating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). This review aims to explore the implications of vitamin D deficiency on MI by assessing multiple observational studies and randomized controlled trials. The findings suggest a positive correlation between low serum vitamin D levels and the incidence of MI, based on observational studies. Additionally, studies reflect that hypovitaminosis D predisposes AMI patients to post-infarction complications and cardiac remodeling. Contrastingly, the impact of vitamin D supplementation on mitigating the risk of MI is debatable, as evidenced by interventional studies. Future research is thus warranted to showcase the promising approach of vitamin D supplementation in lowering the risk of MI, alongside investigating optimal dosing and evaluating long-term impacts on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.