Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944445›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Comparative Analysis of Machine-Learning Algorithms for Automated International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 Coding in Malaysian Death Records.

Muhammad Naufal B Nordin, Vivek J Jayaraj, Muhd Zulfadli Hafiz Ismail, Evi Diana Omar, Zamtira Seman, Yusrina M Yusoff, Najjah Tohar, Nik Noor Syamimi Ismail, Hasnah Mat, Mohd Azahadi Omar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muhammad Naufal B NordinHealth Informatics Centre, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, MYS.
Vivek J JayarajSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Muhd Zulfadli Hafiz IsmailSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Evi Diana OmarSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Zamtira SemanSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Yusrina M YusoffSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Najjah ToharSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Nik Noor Syamimi IsmailSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Hasnah MatSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.
Mohd Azahadi OmarSector for Biostatistics and Data Repository, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explores machine learning (ML) for automating unstructured textual data translation into structured International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes, aiming to identify algorithms that enhance mortality data accuracy and reliability for public health decisions.

methodsThis study analyzed death records from January 2017 to June 2022, sourced from Malaysia's Health Informatics Centre, coded into ICD-10. Data anonymization adhered to ethical standards, with 387,650 death registrations included after quality checks. The dataset, limited to three-digit ICD-10 codes, underwent cleaning and an 80:20 training-testing split. Preprocessing involved HTML tag removal and tokenization. ML approaches, including BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), Gzip+KNN (K-Nearest Neighbors), XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting), TensorFlow, SVM (Support Vector Machine), and Naive Bayes, were evaluated for automated ICD-10 coding. Models were fine-tuned and assessed across accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall, specificity, and precision-recall curves using Amazon SageMaker (Amazon Web Services, Seattle, WA). Sensitivity analysis addressed unbalanced data scenarios, enhancing model robustness.

resultsIn assessing ICD-10 coding with ML, Gzip+KNN had the longest training time at 10 hours, with BERT leading in memory use. BERT performed best for the F1-score (0.71) and accuracy (0.82), closely followed by Gzip+KNN. TensorFlow excelled in recall, whereas SVM had the highest specificity but lower overall performance. XGBoost was notably less effective across metrics. Precision-recall analysis showed Gzip+KNN's superiority. On an unbalanced dataset, BERT and Gzip+KNN demonstrated consistent accuracy.

conclusionOur study highlights that BERT and Gzip+KNN optimize ICD-10 coding, balancing efficiency, resource use, and accuracy. BERT excels in precision with higher memory demands, while Gzip+KNN offers robust accuracy and recall. This suggests significant potential for improving healthcare analytics and decision-making through advanced ML models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomationhealth informaticsinternational classification of diseasesnatural language processingtextual data analysis

Identifiers

PMID39944445
PMCPMC11813644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.