ArticleCureus2025
Management of Posterior Capsular Rent in Cataract Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in India: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Posterior capsular rent - Prevention, recognition, and management - A review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCataracts are the primary cause of preventable blindness worldwide, especially in India. Various surgical procedures are available for treating cataracts. Nevertheless, extreme vigilance is required to avoid associated complications of surgical procedures such as posterior capsular rent (PCR), endophthalmitis, and nucleus drop.
aimTo identify preoperative risk factors, intraoperative management, and postoperative outcomes in patients with PCR.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of patients operated on for cataracts by small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) or phacoemulsification from January 2018 to October 2023 at Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College and Hospital, Sangli, India. Records were collected, and 29 eyes of 29 patients who had had PCR during cataract surgery were evaluated for one month postoperatively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for data analysis.
resultsThe average age of patients with PCR was 67.8 years, and 55.17% were men. Sixty-nine percent of cases were of SICS, 31.03% of phacoemulsification, and PCR occurred in 51.7% of cases by an inexperienced surgeon. With PCR, risk factors such as corneal opacity (6.9%), pterygium (13.8%), shallow anterior chamber (3.45%), pseudo-exfoliation (13.8%), and small pupil (3.45%) were found to be linked. Management of PCR was performed in 29 cases. Anterior vitrectomy with intraocular lens (IOL) placement in the bag was done in 20.7% of cases (six cases), while anterior vitrectomy with IOL placement in the sulcus and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with IOL placement in the sulcus were performed in 3.45% of cases each (one case each). Anterior vitrectomy with iris-claw lens implantation was performed in 13.8% of cases (four cases). Additionally, 6.9% of cases (two cases) were left aphakic, which were later managed with PPV and scleral-fixated IOL (SFIOL) in one case and iris-claw lens implantation in the other. On post-op day 30, 20 patients (69%) achieved the best corrected visual acuity of 6/9-6/6, eight patients (27.6%) achieved 6/18-6/9, and one patient (3.45%) achieved 6/24. On comparison of preoperative vision with vision on day 30, the Z value was -4.418, and the P-value was less than 0.001, showing a statistically significant difference.
conclusionsOur study showed that with proper intraoperative management and follow-up, PCR can be managed with excellent visual recovery (96.5% of our cases regained vision 6/9 and better).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.