ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring During Ureteroscopy: A Delphi Panel Consensus.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Changes in renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease after ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis from EAU endourology.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- Experimental and clinical studies: a scoping review of intrarenal pressure in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Endoluminal anatomy in retrograde ureteroscopy: surgical landmarks and clinical implications.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Paradigm shifts in fluid management using suction irrigation pressure autoregulating systems in modern flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction access sheath: an evidence-based narrative from EAU Endourology.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Real-world DISS practice combined with and without access sheath: insights from the global DISS dataset: a EAU endourology study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Parameter mapping for the use of flexible and navigable suction sheath: an in vitro study.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Renal function outcomes following endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Suction Ureteral Access Sheaths During Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones: A Prospective Study and Cost Analysis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Incidence of urinary infections and urosepsis after ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review of literature.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- Quadrifecta during retrograde intrarenal surgery: suction, irrigation, intrarenal temperature and pressure: achieving best clinical outcomes - an overview from EAU Endourology.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
- Mind the pressure - Why does intrarenal pressure monitoring matter? Overview from EAU endourology.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) may increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing ureteroscopy. As there is limited clarity on a threshold value for high IRP, how to manage high IRP, or which patients are at greater risk of complications due to high IRP, we used the Delphi methodology to understand expert opinion in this area. Methods: The Delphi process comprised two online surveys and an in-person meeting. During the in-person meeting, areas of disagreement and consensus were explored. Consensus statements were developed and voted on to determine the level of consensus. The study was granted a waiver by HML IRB Research and Ethics (reference number 2193). Key findings and limitations: The pan-European panel started with 12 and ended with 11 experienced endourologists. Eleven consensus statements were developed. The statements cover topics such as the definition of high IRP, complications linked to high IRP, and patient risk factors for these complications. After anonymous voting, consensus was achieved for all the statements. Two had a strong level and nine had a moderate level of agreement. There was no consensus on an IRP threshold, although the majority would be concerned for patient safety at a pressure above 61-80 cm H Conclusions and clinical implications: Any IRP above normal physiological levels should be considered high. High IRP during ureteroscopy is a concern for patient safety. It is important to understand links between high IRP, patient characteristics, and complications. We call for additional research to better understand these risks and to inform refinements to clinical practice. Patient summary: A group of experts were asked their opinion on pressure within the kidney (intrarenal pressure, IRP) during a procedure called ureteroscopy (URS), when a narrow telescope is passed through the bladder and into the tube connected to the kidney. Statements that the panel agreed on were developed. These statements show that there is a concern about high IRP during URS as it may be linked to a higher risk of complications for the patient. More research is needed to better understand high IRP and its link to patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.