ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2024
Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Stabilization Using Adeolu's Technique: A Prospective Study from Nigeria.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to resource constraints, advanced spinal stabilization methods such as pedicle screws are unavailable at our center. Adeolu's technique, which employs low-cost and readily available vertical struts and spinal process wires, has been used as an adjunct in treating various spinal conditions to achieve rigid spinal constructs. This study evaluates the long-term clinical outcomes of this technique. Methods: Nineteen patients treated with Adeolu's technique were prospectively followed to assess clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes included symptom reduction, absence of adverse events or need for re-intervention, and radiological evidence of stabilization and unrestricted mobilization. Secondary outcomes included back pain intensity, implant-related complications (rotation, migration, back-out, fracture), wound infection, worsening neurological status, and need for implant removal Data were analyzed using SPSS with simple descriptive statistics. Results: The average follow-up period was 4.1 years (Range: 0.1 - 9.0 years). Patients' ages ranged from 20 to 81 years (Mean: 48.5). Indications for surgery included lumbar spondylosis (7, 36.8%), spinal trauma with unstable fractures (4, 21.1%), spinal tumors (4, 21.1%), and Pott's disease (4, 21.1%). All patients achieved satisfactory primary outcomes. Implant rotation was observed in 4 patients (21.1%), and implant migration in 1 patient (5.3%), requiring removal. Superficial surgical site infection occurred in 2 patients (10.5%). No implant fractures, deep infections, or worsening neurological status were noted. Conclusion: Adeolu's technique is effective for a range of spinal pathologies, with favorable long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.