ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2024
"
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic autopsy has been in use for long to determine the cause of death. Since recently however 'Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling' (MITS) is introduced to determine definitive cause of neonatal death. This study describes locally established facilitators to introduce MITS procedures to determine cause of neonatal death in Ethiopia. Methods: Exploratory study was conducted in Butajira community where twenty-two key informants representing community opinion leaders' health care workers, five in depth interviews with parents who recently lost neonates and eight FGDs with community members were completed to generate evidences in line with the research question. Interviews and discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed facilitated by open-code software. Thematic analysis was applied to identify and interpret patterns of the evidences. Results: In Butajira, ANC and delivery in health facilities was found to have improved over the years. Yet, child death remains an outstanding problem. While different factors were identified to cause the death of a child, relatively few participants choose to accept newborn death as a natural occurrence or will of the creator. Majority of the study participants expressed interest to know definitive cause of death using MITS. Yet, awareness about MITS and how it works was unanimously desired. It was found that husbands and wives are key to authorize MITS procedure while community opinion leaders including religious leaders were identified as key to influence parental decisions for the procedure. Conclusion: Building awareness of the community members and engagement of opinion leaders is critical to introduce MITS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.