RevieweGastroenterology2024
Pancreatic incidentaloma: incidental findings from history towards the era of liquid biopsy.
Review in eGastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term survival and molecular heterogeneity of sporadic multifocal non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.iScience · 2026Article
- Insights into artificial intelligence-based digital pathology in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Inflammatory Pancreatic Diseases.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report provides an overview of the most common diagnostic methods that bring to light incidental findings of pancreatic cancer. It reviews the impact of medical imaging and genetic assessment on the definitions of incidental findings and incidentaloma of the pancreas. For different diagnostic approaches (eg, MRI and CT) and for different affections (cysts/intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, solid lesions), specific guidelines have been proposed and some are established. Based on this, we summarise the differences between the traditional methods with those applied in the PANCAID project. Biomarkers, genetic predispositions, mutations and circulating tumour cells give rise to different levels of concern. The final part of the report discusses the risks and the opportunities associated with further diagnostic procedures and surgical interventions. From the ethical perspective, the most urging question is, can a screening based on liquid biopsy and blood samples open a gateway for the prevention of pancreatic cancer-even if morbidity and lethality of today's surgical interventions is still very high?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.