Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944355›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024

ZINQ-L: a zero-inflated quantile approach for differential abundance analysis of longitudinal microbiome data.

Shuai Li, Runzhe Li, John R Lee, Ni Zhao, Wodan Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuai LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Runzhe LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
John R LeeDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Ni ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Wodan LingDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Statistical methods for analyzing messy microbiome data: detection of hidden artifacts and robust modeling approachesR01GM147162 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ni Zhao · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Statistical Methods for Large Scale Microbiome Studies of Cardiovascular Disease RiskR01HL155417 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Statistical Methods for Enhanced Mapping of Microbiome RelationshipsR01GM151301 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI MICHAEL Chiao-An WU · 2023 to 2026
$1.2M
Robust Statistical Methods for Longitudinal Microbiome StudiesR01GM155734 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Wodan Ling · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
Gut Microbiome, Acute Rejection, and Tacrolimus Dosing in Kidney TransplantationK23AI124464 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LEE, JOHN RICHARD · 2016 to 2020
$944k
Statistical methods for integrative analysis of multiple microbiome datasetsR21AI154236 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, NI · 2021 to 2022
$463k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155417NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI124464NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI154236NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147162NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM151301NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM155734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying bacterial taxa associated with disease phenotypes or clinical treatments over time is critical for understanding the underlying biological mechanism. Association testing for microbiome data is already challenging due to its complex distribution that involves sparsity, over-dispersion, heavy tails, etc. The longitudinal nature of the data adds another layer of complexity - one needs to account for the within-subject correlations to avoid biased results. Existing longitudinal differential abundance approaches usually depend on strong parametric assumptions, such as zero-inflated normal or negative binomial. However, the complex microbiome data frequently violate these distributional assumptions, leading to inflated false discovery rates. In addition, the existing methods are mostly mean-based, unable to identify heterogeneous associations such as tail events or subgroup effects, which could be important biomedical signals. Methods: We propose a zero-inflated quantile approach for longitudinal (ZINQ-L) microbiome differential abundance test. A mixed-effects quantile rank-score-based test was proposed for hypothesis testing, which consists of a test in mixed-effects logistic model for the presence-absence status of the investigated taxon, and a series of mixed-effects quantile rank-score tests adjusted for zero inflation given its presence. As a regression method with minimal distributional assumptions, it is robust to the complex microbiome data, controlling false discovery rate, and is flexible to adjust for important covariates. Its comprehensive examination of the abundance distribution enables the identification of heterogeneous associations, improving the testing power. Results: Extensive simulation studies and an application to a real kidney transplant microbiome study demonstrate the improved power of ZINQ-L in detecting true signals while controlling false discovery rates. Conclusion: ZINQ-L is a zero-inflated quantile-based approach for detecting individual taxa associated with outcomes or exposures in longitudinal microbiome studies, providing a robust and powerful option to improve and complement the existing methods in the field.

Indexed as

heterogeneous associationslongitudinal microbiome studiesmixed-effects modelsquantile rank-score testzero inflation and disperson

Identifiers

PMID39944355
PMCPMC11814158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.