Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944347›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

A model to understand risk behavior: Interoception awareness and motivational systems in the binge watching.

Giuseppe Forte, Francesca Favieri, Francesca Agostini, Maria Casagrande, Renata Tambelli

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuseppe ForteDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Francesca FavieriDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Francesca AgostiniDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Maria CasagrandeDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Renata TambelliDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to test the interoceptive-motivational hypothesis as a possible marker for the risk of developing binge-watching (BW) as a behavioral addiction. Like other risky behaviors, BW can be included in a model that includes the interaction of personological and physiological factors as predictors of the behavioral outcome. On a sample of 741 young adults, a structural equation model considered the association between the interoceptive indices (MAIA questionnaire), inhibition/activation systems (BIS/BAS questionnaire) of the motivational theory, and BW pattern (BWAQ questionnaire). The results suggested a different interaction between the variables when BW was considered as a leisure activity and as an at-risk behavior. While in the first case, interoception and BIS/BAS systems interact, and BIS and interoception positively affect the increase of BW as a leisure activity, in BW as at-risk behavior, the interoceptive-motivational link is lost, and a different pattern of association with the behavior emerges. BIS and BW are still positively associated with the problematic expression of the behavior. The result would suggest that persons exhibiting better interoceptive sensitivity display lower risk of addictive BW. Finally, the interoceptive-motivational model, if confirmed in other at-risk behaviors, would provide a new perspective in the field of behavioral addictions.

Indexed as

Behavior addictionBinge watchingBody awarenessEmotion regulationInteroception

Identifiers

PMID39944347
PMCPMC11815647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.