Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944273›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

dotears: Scalable and consistent directed acyclic graph estimation using observational and interventional data.

Albert Xue, Jingyou Rao, Sriram Sankararaman, Harold Pimentel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albert XueBioinformatics Indepartmental Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Jingyou RaoDepartment of Computer Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Sriram SankararamanDepartment of Computer Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Harold PimentelDepartment of Computer Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

Funding

Statistical Models for Dissecting Human Population Admixture and its Role in Evolution and DiseaseR35GM125055 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SANKARARAMAN, SRIRAM · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
Expressive and scalable statistical models for genomic and biomedical dataR35GM153406 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sriram Sankararaman · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM125055NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM153406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New assays such as Perturb-seq link parallel CRISPR interventions to transcriptomic readouts, providing insight into gene regulatory networks. Causal regulatory networks can be represented by directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), but lack of identifiability and a combinatorial solution space complicate learning DAGs from observational data. Score-based methods have improved the practical scalability of inferring DAGs, but are sensitive to error variance structure. Furthermore, correction for error variance is difficult without prior knowledge of structure. We present dotears [doo-tairs], a continuous optimization framework leveraging observational and interventional data to infer causal structure, assuming a linear Structural Equation Model. dotears exploits structural consequences of hard interventions to estimate and correct for error variance structure. dotears is a provably consistent estimator of the true DAG under mild assumptions and outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in varied simulations. In real data, differential expression tests and high-confidence protein-protein interactions validate dotears-inferred edges with higher precision and recall than others.

Indexed as

Biocomputational methodBioinformaticsGene network

Identifiers

PMID39944273
PMCPMC11814701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.