ArticleiScience2025
dotears: Scalable and consistent directed acyclic graph estimation using observational and interventional data.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale causal discovery using interventional data sheds light on gene network structure in k562 cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Large-scale causal discovery using interventional data sheds light on the regulatory network architecture of blood traits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New assays such as Perturb-seq link parallel CRISPR interventions to transcriptomic readouts, providing insight into gene regulatory networks. Causal regulatory networks can be represented by directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), but lack of identifiability and a combinatorial solution space complicate learning DAGs from observational data. Score-based methods have improved the practical scalability of inferring DAGs, but are sensitive to error variance structure. Furthermore, correction for error variance is difficult without prior knowledge of structure. We present dotears [doo-tairs], a continuous optimization framework leveraging observational and interventional data to infer causal structure, assuming a linear Structural Equation Model. dotears exploits structural consequences of hard interventions to estimate and correct for error variance structure. dotears is a provably consistent estimator of the true DAG under mild assumptions and outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in varied simulations. In real data, differential expression tests and high-confidence protein-protein interactions validate dotears-inferred edges with higher precision and recall than others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.