Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944271›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site]2025

Gaps in U.S. livestock data are a barrier to effective environmental and disease management.

Rebecca Logsdon Muenich, Sanskriti Aryal, Amanda J Ashworth, Michelle L Bell, Melanie R Boudreau, Stephanie A Cunningham, K Colton Flynn, Kerry A Hamilton, Ting Liu, Michael L Mashtare and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rebecca Logsdon MuenichBiological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9920-9346
Sanskriti AryalQuantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0852-7274
Amanda J AshworthUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-8939
Michelle L BellSchool of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-1359
Melanie R BoudreauQuantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-5598
Stephanie A CunninghamQuantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4470-3299
K Colton FlynnUnited States Department of Agriculture, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-1071
Kerry A HamiltonSchool of Sustainable Engineering & the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-7325
Ting LiuBiological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2899-2983
Michael L MashtareDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-5863
Natalie G NelsonScience and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-7622
Barira RashidBiological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-1675
Arghajeet SahaBiological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3983-3005
Danica Schaffer-SmithSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3896-1483
Callie ShowalterScience and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-333X
Aureliane TchamdjaScience and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7173-4241
Jada ThompsonAgricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-1461

Funding

Containerizing tasks to ensure robust AI/ML data curation pipelines to estimate environmental disparities in the rural southR01MD016054 · NIMHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Michelle L Bell, Nicole Deziel · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD016054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock are a critical part of our food systems, yet their abundance globally has been cited as a driver of many environmental and human health concerns. Issues such as soil, water, and air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, aquifer depletion, antimicrobial resistance genes, and zoonotic disease outbreaks have all been linked to livestock operations. While many studies have examined these issues at depth at local scales, it has been difficult to complete studies at regional or national scales due to the dearth of livestock data, hindering pollution mitigation or response time for tracing and monitoring disease outbreaks. In the U.S. the National Agricultural Statistics Service completes a Census once every 5 years that includes livestock, but data are only available at the county level leaving little inference that can be made at such a coarse spatiotemporal scale. While other data exist through some regulated permitting programs, there are significant data gaps in where livestock are raised, how many livestock are on site at a given time, and how these livestock and, importantly, their waste emissions, are managed. In this perspective, we highlight the need for better livestock data, then discuss the accessibility and key limitations of currently available data. We then feature some recent work to improve livestock data availability through remote-sensing and machine learning, ending with our takeaways to address these data needs for the future of environmental and public health management.

Indexed as

climate changelivestockmanurenutrient managementpollutionzoonotic disease risk

Identifiers

PMID39944271
PMCPMC11811603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.