ArticleeGastroenterology2024
Early clinical predictors of infected pancreatic necrosis: a multicentre cohort study.
Article in eGastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Necrotizing Pancreatitis With Multidrug-Resistant Infection and Portal Vein Thrombosis.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Genome-wide investigations of the lipid accumulation product index pinpoints polygenic determinants underlying pancreatitis susceptibility.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting chronic critical illness in ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) exacerbates complications in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), increasing mortality rates if not treated promptly. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of clinical characteristics within 24 hours of admission for IPN prediction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentre cohort study including 3005 patients with AP from eight hospitals in China. Clinical variables collected within 24 hours after admission were analysed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (10 cross-validations) for variable selection, followed by multivariate logistic regression to develop an IPN prediction model. Internal cross-validation of the development set and validation of the validation set were performed to ensure robustness. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate its clinical utility. Results: IPN occurred in 176 patients (176/3005, 5.9%). The final model included temperature, respiratory rate, plasma calcium ion concentration, serum urea nitrogen and serum glucose. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.89), outperforming widely used severity scoring systems. The model demonstrated robust performance on the internal validation cohort (mean AUC: 0.84) and external validation cohort (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI 0. 77 to 0.87). Conclusion: We developed a simple and robust model for predicting IPN in patients with AP, demonstrating strong predictive performance and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.