Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944197›Full record

SynthesisMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2024

Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Emergency Medicine Triage - A Systematic Review.

Qasem Ahmed Almulihi, Abdulaziz Adel Alquraini, Fatimah Ahmed Ali Almulihi, Abdullah Abdulaziz Alzahid, Saleh Saeed Al Jathnan Al Qahtani, Mohamed Almulhim, Saeed Hussain Saeed Alqhtani, Faisal Mohammed Nafea Alnafea, Saad Ali Saad Mushni, Nasser Abdullah Alaqil and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewCase Reports
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Perception and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in Emergency Medicine: A multi-country study in Sub-Saharan Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qasem Ahmed AlmulihiER Department, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Adel AlqurainiER Department, MOH, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah Ahmed Ali AlmulihiER Department, MOH, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Abdulaziz AlzahidER Department, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh Saeed Al Jathnan Al QahtaniTeaching Assistant, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed AlmulhimER Department, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed Hussain Saeed AlqhtaniEmergency Department, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Dhahran.
Faisal Mohammed Nafea AlnafeaEmergency Department, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Dhahran.
Saad Ali Saad MushniEmergency Department, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Dhahran.
Nasser Abdullah AlaqilFamily Medicine Urgent Care Department. Alkharj Armed Forces Hospital. Kharj City, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Ibrahim Faya AssiriER Department, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Nisreen H MaghrabyER Department, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Overcrowding in Emergency departments adversely impacts efficiency, patient outcomes, and resource allocation. Accurate triage systems are essential for prioritizing care and optimizing resources. While traditional methods provide a foundation, they often lack precision in addressing modern healthcare complexities. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer advanced capabilities to enhance triage accuracy, improve patient prioritization, and support clinical decision-making, addressing limitations of conventional approaches and paving the way for adaptive triage solutions. Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in determining the outcomes of patients presenting in Emergency department (ED) triage. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on April 21, 2023, using electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Google Scholar, without year restrictions. The main outcome of this review was to assess the use of AI and ML in the ED Triage. Articles that used different models of AI and ML to predict various outcomes of patients in the ED setting were included. Results: A total of 17 studies were included in this systematic review. Fifteen studies assessed the role of machine learning methods in emergency department triage, while two studies evaluated the role of AI and machine learning in prehospital triage. The results of our systematic review favor the use of machine learning methods and artificial intelligence in emergency triage. Machine learning models were found to be superior to conventional emergency severity score methods in determining triage, diagnosis, and early management of patients. Among the machine learning methods, the boosting model was slightly more effective. Conclusion: Our study supports the notion that AI and ML are the future of Emergency departments. They aid in predicting patient outcomes and determining appropriate management strategies more efficiently, thereby enhancing decision making in the ED.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningTriageEmergency MedicineHumansArtificial intelligenceEmergency departmentmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39944197
PMCPMC11813208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.