Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944169›Full record

ArticleVeterinary record open2025

Building management capability for clinical veterinary organisations-An Australian pilot study.

Zhanming Liang, Taleta Hompas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary record open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhanming LiangCollege of Business, Law and Governance Townsville Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-4017
Taleta HompasCollege of Business, Law and Governance Townsville Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1910-2847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Veterinary care is facing critical levels of attrition that challenge its sustainability in the provision of standards of care. A competent and skilled management workforce, along with enhanced organisational structures and procedures, is essential to effectively address the challenges that veterinary organisations face today and in the future. Methods: The pilot study adapted the Management Competency Assessment Partnership (MCAP) tool to collect data from 35 mid-level and senior managers working in five veterinary organisations in Australia via an online survey to understand their competency development needs and the obstacles that they were facing in the management roles. Univariate analyses, Pearson correlations, Kaiser‒Meyer‒Olkin test and Bartlett's test of sphericity were performed. Results: This study confirmed that the MCAP tool maintained good internal consistency and identified competency gaps that managers in the five veterinary organisations should consider addressing. The study confirmed the positive correlation between informal management-related training and self-study on management issues and self-perceived management competency level. The results supported the need for veterinary organisations to provide management training to foster a culture of continuous improvement and life-long learning among veterinary managers. Conclusions: This study highlighted the core elements essential for the building management capacity of veterinary care services and organisations. It also validated the value of management competency self-assessment in identifying the development needs of managers, demonstrating how the management development framework adapted from the human healthcare sector can guide the development of a competent management workforce for veterinary care.

Indexed as

competency assessmentleadershipmanagement competencyveterinary

Identifiers

PMID39944169
PMCPMC11814534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.