ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2025
Role of Retrograde Tibiopedal Access in Limb Salvage in Patients with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia.
Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde tibiopedal access as an alternative approach in cases of critical limb ischemia (CLI) when antegrade access has failed. A prospective study was conducted that included patients with CLI who underwent tibiopedal access after failed antegrade recanalization from January 2018 to June 2022. Follow-up was conducted at 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcomes evaluated were technical success rate and primary patency. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, mortality rate, and limb salvage rate (LSR). Forty-eight patients had CLI and Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus infrainguinal lesions. The retrograde approach was used through the anterior tibial artery in 28 patients (58%), the posterior tibial artery in 18 patients (37.5%), and the peroneal artery in 2 patients (4.5%). Technical success was achieved in 90% of patients (43 patients). There was a significant increase in the anklebrachial index after the procedure with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Twenty-two months primary patency rate was 85.2%, while secondary patency rate was 100% and LSR was 96%, respectively. There was no mortality in the series. Retrograde tibiopedal approach is an alternative option for managing peripheral arterial disease and CLI. This method offers another means of crossing lesions when antegrade access failed, and the intervention can be completed either in an antegrade or retrograde approach. As the retrograde approach does not impact access site, considered a feasible safe treatment alternative which increase the success rate of endovascular treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.