Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944142›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2025

Major Delay in Door-to-Ballon Time for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Not Related to Interventional Cardiologist's Late Arrival.

Mohammad R Movahed, Rana Irilouzadian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad R MovahedDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-0510
Rana IrilouzadianDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional cardiologists are held accountable for delay in the door-to-balloon time (DBT) for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) even though in the chain of STEMI activation, the interventional cardiologist is the last person that needs to be available to start angiography. The goal of our study is to conduct a thorough analysis of the DBT data to assess time delays by randomly evaluating two consecutive years at the University of Arizona Medical Center (UAMC). We evaluated all available DBT data for STEMIs occurring in the fiscal years of 2011 and 2012 at the UAMC and calculated the time needed for the cardiologist to start the procedure after the patient was ready in the cardiac catheterization laboratory called time to start the procedure (TSP) in addition to other time intervals. Mean TSP time was 4 minutes and 24 seconds, one of the shortest time delays in the chain of STEMI activation and DBT. The median TSP delay was 3 minutes. The longest delay interval was the STEMI team's arrival to with a mean of 17 minutes and 38 seconds. Our data are the first to evaluate delays related to DBT revealing the least delay occurring due to the late arrival of Interventional cardiologists. Our data emphasizes the importance of performing a detailed time analysis of the DBT.

Indexed as

coronary revascularizationdoor-to-balloon timeprimary angioplastyprimary PCIprimary stentingSTEMItiming

Identifiers

PMID39944142
PMCPMC11813602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.