ArticleJPGN reports2025
Gastrostomy tube placement for children with autism spectrum disorders and functional constipation.
Article in JPGN reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constipation outcomes in children with and without autism spectrum disorder: Insights from a tertiary motility service.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- [Research progress on mechanisms and clinical management of comorbid constipation in children with autism spectrum disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Review
- Gastrostomy tube placement for children with autism spectrum disorders and functional constipation.JPGN reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Children with functional constipation (FC) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often face sensory and behavioral conditions that prevent giving oral medical therapy to improve constipation and incontinence. We aimed to assess whether children with ASD and FC who had difficulty in taking oral medications could benefit from gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed in children diagnosed with ASD and FC from 2020 to 2023. Children were considered candidates for GT if they suffered from constipation that adversely affected daily function and refused adequate oral medical therapy. Data were collected on ASD severity and FC symptoms before GT and after GT placement. Results: There were nine patients who underwent GT placement. Median age was 7.4 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.8-9.7). Of the five with available ASD evaluations, four had extremely low intelligence quotient and extremely low adaptive skills; only one child of the nine was verbal. Before GT placement, most patients had Bristol 1 or 2 consistency stool (66.7%); following placement, most had Bristol 5 or 6 consistency stool (66.7%). Seven children strained with bowel movements before GT; only one child strained after GT. There were no tube dislodgements or site infections. Gastrointestinal quality of life scores improved for both constipation (+38.5, IQR: 27.5-54.3) and medication administration (+31.5, IQR: 0.0-75.0). Conclusions: GT placement may be a viable option in children with FC and ASD with minimal complications, improvement in constipation, and improvement in quality of life. Further prospective study will ensure generalizability of these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.