Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944087›Full record

ArticleJournal of central nervous system disease2025

Prevalence and outcomes of mild stroke patients undergoing reperfusion therapy: A meta-analysis and SAFE recommendations for optimal management.

Pathmesh Rajeswaran, Bella B Huasen, Peter Stanwell, Murray C Killingsworth, Sonu M M Bhaskar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of central nervous system disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pathmesh RajeswaranGlobal Health Neurology Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bella B HuasenDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Lancashire University Teaching Hospitals, and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter StanwellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Murray C KillingsworthUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW), South Western Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sonu M M BhaskarGlobal Health Neurology Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-3628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS), characterized by a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 or less, can lead to significant long-term disabilities. Reperfusion therapies like intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are commonly used in AIS, but their efficacy and safety in mild stroke cases remain unclear. Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to clarify the prevalence of mild AIS and evaluate the outcomes of reperfusion therapy, specifically IVT and EVT, in terms of functional recovery, mortality, stroke recurrence, and adverse events such as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and early neurological deterioration (END). Design: A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to combine and assess the results of independent studies examining the use of reperfusion therapies in patients with mild AIS. Data Sources and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. Studies assessing mild AIS prevalence and the outcomes of reperfusion therapy were included. Random effects modelling was applied to evaluate associations between reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes at 90 days. Results: Fifty-six studies, including 474 778 patients, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of mild stroke was 54% among all AIS cases, 29% in IVT-treated patients, and 9% in EVT-treated patients. Reperfusion therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of sICH (OR 2.92), ICH (OR 2.20), and END (OR 2.37). However, no significant association was found with excellent functional outcomes (OR 0.93), good functional outcomes (OR 0.91), mortality (OR 1.14), or stroke recurrence (OR 0.93) at 90 days. Variations were observed between different reperfusion subgroups. Conclusion: Mild AIS is prevalent, and reperfusion therapy in these cases is linked to higher rates of adverse events without a clear benefit in functional outcomes or mortality. These findings support the need for selective reperfusion therapy in mild stroke patients. The proposed SAFE framework-Selective use of IVT, Assessment of individual factors, Focus on EVT for large vessel occlusion (LVO), and Establishment of region-specific guidelines-may help guide clinical decisions. Further research should refine patient selection criteria and explore adjunctive therapies.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokebridging therapyclinical outcomesMild strokeprevalencereperfusion therapythrombectomythrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID39944087
PMCPMC11815822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.