ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) accumulate in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS), multiple sulfatase deficiency, and mucolipidoses; measurement of total GAGs and the specific excretion pattern by fractionation can aid in their diagnosis. Since 1993, the College of American Pathologists with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has offered proficiency testing (PT) for urine GAG analysis accessible to laboratories worldwide. Methods: Data from PT surveys administered from 2016 to 2022 were assessed for trends in participation and methodological platforms used, as well as analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy by method and disease. Results: The number of participating laboratories declined from 43 in 2016 to 28 in 2022. Fourteen urine samples with clinical vignettes were distributed; the median of correct diagnoses reported was 91.5% (range: 74%-100%). The best performing methodologies for total GAG analysis and fractionation were dimethylmethylene blue-dye-binding spectrophotometric assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. MPS IV samples posed the greatest diagnostic challenge, whereas the overall false-positive rate was low. Conclusion: Based on the data reviewed, best patient care for those at risk of an MPS is achieved by a combination of total GAG analysis and GAG fractionation. Development of liquid-chromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry-based methods for quantitative, differentiated GAG analysis or disease-specific GAG-derived nonreducing end oligosaccharide fragments in combination with multiplexed lysosomal enzyme assays will likely improve diagnostic accuracy. The decline of laboratories participating in PT is concerning because MPS are increasingly included in newborn screening programs and urinary GAGs can be used to monitor the effectiveness of new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.