Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944022›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Comparison of fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through LMA Protector and i-gel in adult paralysed patients - A randomised comparative study.

Mamta Bhardwaj, Karthik Manoharan, Kirti Kshetrapal, Karishma Dhankhar, Amit Singh, Susheela Taxak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mamta BhardwajDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D Sharma PGIMS at University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3942-3268
Karthik ManoharanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D Sharma PGIMS at University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0031-2011
Kirti KshetrapalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D Sharma PGIMS at University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1860-3163
Karishma DhankharDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D Sharma PGIMS at University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2327-085X
Amit SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D Sharma PGIMS at University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3839-0245
Susheela TaxakDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D Sharma PGIMS at University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-4093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are used for ventilation and a conduit for fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation (FGI). LMA Protector is a novel second-generation SAD with a wide airway lumen to pass an adequately sized tracheal tube. Few authors have compared LMA Protector with i-gel for FGI using reinforced tubes, and their results have been contradictory. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) endotracheal tube (ETT) is the most commonly used ETT in the operation theatre and critical care units. Hence, we conducted this study to compare FGI through i-gel and LMA Protector using PVC ETT. Methods: After institutional committee approval and trial registration, 66 patients aged 18-70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II were recruited for this randomised study. Patients were randomly allocated to groups LP and IG. The primary outcome was to compare time to tracheal intubation via two SADs. Insertion characteristics such as the number of insertion attempts, mean time of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and intubation characteristics (time to view carina, number of attempts, etc.) were considered secondary outcomes. Independent Student's Results: Demographic parameters were comparable in the two groups ( Conclusion: LMA Protector and i-gel are technically comparable conduits for fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in adult paralysed patients.

Indexed as

Airway managementfibreoptic tracheal intubationi-gelLMA Protectorpolyvinyl chloridesupraglottic airway

Identifiers

PMID39944022
PMCPMC11812508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.