Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39944011›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound protocol for confirmation of endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients undergoing surgery: A prospective observational study.

Adhiraj Baruah, Zainab Ahmad, Vaishali Waindeskar, Shikha Jain, Roshan Chanchlani, Pranita Mandal, Amit Agarwal, Shristi Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adhiraj BaruahDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3953-3746
Zainab AhmadDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-607X
Vaishali WaindeskarDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0556-7159
Shikha JainDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-7856
Roshan ChanchlaniDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8086-9376
Pranita MandalDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-3296
Amit AgarwalDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-5448
Shristi AgarwalDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6132-0372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: We devised and compared the accuracy and time required for a 5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound (USG) protocol for confirming endotracheal intubation (ETI) and endotracheal tube (ETT) positioning (ETP) with the current reference standard of quantitative waveform capnography (QWC) and auscultation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 75 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II children between 2 and 12 years undergoing elective surgery were recruited. ETI and ETP were confirmed clinically and sonographically using the 5-AIR USG protocol, which involves real-time tracheal USG followed by bilateral pleural and diaphragmatic ultrasonography. Results: There was no oesophageal intubation in this study; hence, the accuracy of the USG protocol for ETI could not be determined. For ETP, 68 patients had correctly placed ETTs. The 5-AIR USG protocol identified 4 out of 7 endobronchial placements, resulting in a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 57.14%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96%. The mean time for confirmation of ETI by QWC (20.77 s (standard deviation (SD): 4.11 s; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.84, 21.70) was longer than real-time tracheal USG (2.11 s (SD: 0.31 s; 95% CI: 2.04, 2.18) ( Conclusion: The 5-AIR USG protocol was useful, fast, and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy to confirm endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients. This protocol may be incorporated along with clinical signs, auscultation, and QWC to confirm endotracheal intubation and position.

Indexed as

5-point airway ultrasonographycapnographyendotracheal intubationendotracheal tube positioningquality of visualisation

Identifiers

PMID39944011
PMCPMC11812502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.