ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024
Early report on abbreviated brachytherapy schema for cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimen with an abbreviated schema for patients with cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: Patients underwent external beam radiation therapy combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Subsequently, brachytherapy (7 × 4 Gy) was administered for 10 days using an abbreviated schema. The treatment plan aimed to deliver a cumulative dose of at least 85 Gy EQD Results: Sixty-nine patients with cervical cancer received definitive chemoradiation therapy, with a median overall treatment time of 56.2 days. The incidence of acute grade 3 hematological toxicity was 62.3%, and grade 4 toxicity was 11.6%. Grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity rates were 5.8%, 2.9%, 2.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. Late gastrointestinal toxicities of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 occurred in 14 (20.3%) and 3 (4.3%) patients, respectively. Late genitourinary toxicities of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 occurred in 8 (11.6%) and 3 (4.3%) patients, respectively. As of December 2023, with a median follow-up of 40 months, 1-year PFS and OS rates were 81.2% and 94.2%, respectively, while 3-year PFS and OS rates were 71.0% and 85.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The abbreviated HDR brachytherapy regimen offered a viable alternative for patients with cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that this treatment schedule maintains therapeutic efficacy and safety, and avoids prolonged treatment duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.