Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943971›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024

Early report on abbreviated brachytherapy schema for cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Youhua Wang, Haowen Pang, Sheng Lin, Xiangxiang Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Youhua Wang *Department of Oncology, Gulin County People's Hospital, Luzhou, China.
Haowen Pang *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Sheng LinDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xiangxiang ShiDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimen with an abbreviated schema for patients with cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: Patients underwent external beam radiation therapy combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Subsequently, brachytherapy (7 × 4 Gy) was administered for 10 days using an abbreviated schema. The treatment plan aimed to deliver a cumulative dose of at least 85 Gy EQD Results: Sixty-nine patients with cervical cancer received definitive chemoradiation therapy, with a median overall treatment time of 56.2 days. The incidence of acute grade 3 hematological toxicity was 62.3%, and grade 4 toxicity was 11.6%. Grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity rates were 5.8%, 2.9%, 2.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. Late gastrointestinal toxicities of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 occurred in 14 (20.3%) and 3 (4.3%) patients, respectively. Late genitourinary toxicities of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 occurred in 8 (11.6%) and 3 (4.3%) patients, respectively. As of December 2023, with a median follow-up of 40 months, 1-year PFS and OS rates were 81.2% and 94.2%, respectively, while 3-year PFS and OS rates were 71.0% and 85.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The abbreviated HDR brachytherapy regimen offered a viable alternative for patients with cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that this treatment schedule maintains therapeutic efficacy and safety, and avoids prolonged treatment duration.

Indexed as

brachytherapycervical cancerCOVID-19 pandemicoverall treatment timesafety

Identifiers

PMID39943971
PMCPMC11812137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.