ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024
Efficacy of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue: Long-term outcomes.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue (TSCC) poses a significant health challenge. Radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) offering distinct advantages. This study investigated the long-term outcomes associated with each technique. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was done reviewing medical records of patients diagnosed with TSCC between 2012 and 2022, who underwent surgery and received adjuvant curative-intent radiotherapy. Patients were categorized based on treatment modality: EBRT alone, EBRT combined with brachytherapy (EBRT+ BT boost), or BT alone. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated at 5 years. Results: A total of 84 patients were included, with 57 receiving EBRT, 14 receiving BT alone, and 13 receiving EBRT + BT boost. The median follow-up was 70 months. The 5-year OS rates were 68% for EBRT, 88% for BT alone, and 92% for EBRT + BT boost. The 5-year DFS rates were 62% for EBRT, 88% for BT alone, and 84% for EBRT + BT boost. The 5-year LRC rates were 85% for EBRT, 100% for BT alone, and 92% for EBRT + BT boost. No significant differences between these modalities in terms of median OS, DFS, and LRC were observed. Conclusions: This study explored the long-term outcomes of EBRT and EBRT + BT boost in TSCC patients. While the initial findings suggest potentially improved outcomes with the combined approach, more studies are necessary for validation. Future research should investigate the impact of these techniques on treatment-related toxicities, providing a more comprehensive picture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.