Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943968›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Factors Influencing the Amount of ACL Remnant Available for Preservation at the Time of ACL Surgery: An Analysis of 5725 Knees From the SANTI Study Group Database.

Alessandro Carrozzo, Mohammed Lahsika, Christian Lattermann, Adnan Saithna, Jae-Sung An, Giancarlo Giurazza, Silvia Cardarelli, Thais Dutra Vieira, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro CarrozzoCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-8139
Mohammed LahsikaCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.
Christian LattermannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Cartilage Repair and Sports Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adnan SaithnaAZBSC Spine & Orthopedics, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2408-5307
Jae-Sung AnCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.
Giancarlo GiurazzaCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4385-6813
Silvia CardarelliCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.
Thais Dutra VieiraCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-1824
Bertrand Sonnery-CottetCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-0425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The preservation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant during reconstruction or repair could offer advantages such as enhanced vascularity, proprioception, and biomechanical properties. However, research on the clinical factors influencing ACL remnant preservation at the time of surgery is limited. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to identify clinical factors influencing the amount of ACL remnant during surgery. It was hypothesized that not solely the delay from injury to surgery influences the amount of ACL remnant present at the time of surgery, but also other patient characteristics such as sex and age, as well as intraoperative findings. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between January 2013 and December 2022. ACL remnants were categorized based on their location into tibial attachment, midsubstance, and femoral attachment, accounting for 20%, 60%, and 20% of the total ACL length, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors predictive of the amount of ACL remnant. Results: In a cohort of 5725 patients, different variables were associated with an ACL remnant <20% at the time of surgery. Patients aged ≤20 years had an odds ratio of 1.748 (95% CI, 1.473-2.075; Conclusion: Increased age at surgery was positively associated with a remnant size ≥20% of the ACL. Female sex, longer delay between accident and surgery, and associated injuries of intra-articular structures were risk factors for a remnant size <20%.

Indexed as

ACLACL biologyACL remnantACL repairarthroscopyknee ligaments

Identifiers

PMID39943968
PMCPMC11815964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.