Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943954›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Early safety and efficacy outcomes of the PAUL glaucoma implant in a Spanish population: A retrospective study.

Sara Labay-Tejado, Néstor Ventura-Abreu, Sofía Porto-Castro, Ainhoa D Castellarnau, M Jesús Muniesa, Elena Millá, Marta Pazos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Systematic Review of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara Labay-TejadoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Néstor Ventura-AbreuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sofía Porto-CastroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ainhoa D CastellarnauDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M Jesús MuniesaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena MilláDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta PazosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PAUL glaucoma implant (PGI) in refractory glaucoma patients, during the early postoperative period.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, cohort study of patients that had received a PGI between February 2022 and December 2023. An intraluminal polypropylene suture was placed to prevent early hypotony in all cases. Demographics, intraocular pressure (IOP), and medication variation were evaluated for up to 6 months. The success rate was stratified into <18 mmHg and 30% from baseline or <15 mmHg and 40% IOP reduction. The safety outcomes were also analyzed.

resultsSixteen eyes from 16 patients were included in the analysis. Fifteen of them had had a previous surgical glaucoma procedure. At 6 months, IOP decreased from 26.6 (±6.2) to 15.3 (±4.6) mmHg, with fewer glaucoma medications, from a median (interquartile range) of 3 (2-3) - 1.5 (0-2) (

conclusionThe PGI seems to be safe and effective from the early postoperative period. The IOP reduction rate could make it suitable for patients with refractory moderate-to-advanced glaucoma.

Indexed as

Angle-closure glaucomaexfoliation syndromeglaucoma drainage deviceopen-angle glaucomaPAUL glaucoma implant

Identifiers

PMID39943954
PMCPMC11811398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.