ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Home iCare - What we already know.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The only known modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma is an increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Current follow-up with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) constitutes a suboptimal approach, given out-of-office IOP peaks and fluctuations will not be exposed. Self-tonometry in the home environment could address this unmet need, detecting uncontrolled disease and potentially impacting further therapeutic management. Since recently, iCare HOME was developed as a handheld rebound tonometer for this purpose. The aim of this literature review is twofold. First, the accuracy of iCare HOME compared to GAT will be assessed, including evaluation of the influence of corneal characteristics and the mean IOP. Second, an overview of the reported feasibility and acceptance on the use of iCare HOME will be presented. The literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Literature was searched on Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (Core Collection) on April 10, 2023. A total of 187 records were identified after deduplication, of which 20 articles were included after full evaluation of their suitability. This study reported that iCare HOME has a moderate to good accuracy compared to GAT and a tendency to underestimate GAT, with a median underestimation of 1 mmHg, ranging from 2.66 mmHg underestimation to 2.08 mmHg overestimation. Success rates ranged between 67.5% and 100% with a median rate of 82.5%. Sufficient acceptance was demonstrated. In conclusion, self-tonometry with iCare HOME constitutes an accurate, feasible, and accepted method for home monitoring of glaucoma, providing additional out-of-office IOP-data, and increasing patient empowerment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.