ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
The effect of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual fields: Unravelling a source of bias in glaucoma management.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of glaucoma on outcomes after epiretinal membrane surgery. a pairwise and post-hoc single-arm meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Erratum: Correction of author name.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling aims to improve visual function. Previous studies have focused on visual acuity, often neglecting visual field (VF) changes. This systematic review examines VF changes after PPV with ILM peeling in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) or macular hole (MH), including those with glaucoma, who have preexisting VF damage, to identify potential biases in glaucoma management. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (A) Patients undergoing ILM peeling for ERM or MH and (B) VF outcomes assessed through standard automated perimetry (SAP) or Goldmann kinetic perimetry. Exclusions were non-English studies and those with fewer than 30 subjects. Data included retinal disease, demographics, VF outcomes (mean deviation [MD], pattern standard deviation, and central VF sensitivity [CVFS]), study design, and use of stains. Out of 612 studies, 23 met our criteria. Of these, four included glaucoma patients and seven involved concomitant phacoemulsification. In glaucoma patients, two studies showed MD improvement in the central 24°, while one showed deterioration in the central 10°, linked to worse preoperative MD and older age. Among studies without glaucoma patients, three of eight using SAP reported increased VF defects (VFDs); two showed lower outer nasal CVFS postoperatively. Indocyanine green staining was linked to higher VFD incidence while triamcinolone acetonide or tryptane blue staining led to no significant VFDs. The nasal half of the central VF was more affected, possibly due to retinal ganglion cell distribution. Further prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to better understand ILM-peeling effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.