Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943924›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2025

A Promoter Collection for Cell-Targeted Analysis Within the Stomatal Complex.

Thanh-Hao Nguyen, Jovaras Krasauskas, Thu Binh-Anh Nguyen, Azka Noureen, Mark Smedley, John M Christie, Wendy Harwood, Michael R Blatt, Penny Hundleby

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thanh-Hao NguyenLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics and the Plant Science Group, School of Molecular Biosciences, Bower Building University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Jovaras KrasauskasJohn Innes Institute Norwich UK.
Thu Binh-Anh NguyenLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics and the Plant Science Group, School of Molecular Biosciences, Bower Building University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-1900
Azka NoureenJohn Innes Institute Norwich UK.
Mark SmedleyJohn Innes Institute Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6162-4795
John M ChristieLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics and the Plant Science Group, School of Molecular Biosciences, Bower Building University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Wendy HarwoodJohn Innes Institute Norwich UK.
Michael R BlattLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics and the Plant Science Group, School of Molecular Biosciences, Bower Building University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-4645
Penny HundlebyJohn Innes Institute Norwich UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomatal aperture is driven by changes in turgor of the guard cells that surround the stomatal pore. Epidermal cells immediately surrounding the guard cells are thought to contribute to the kinetics of aperture changes through changes in their turgor that opposes the guard cells and thought their putative roles in solute storage for use by the guard cells. Nonetheless, our knowledge remains fragmentary of surrounding cell mechanics, in large part because the tools and strategies needed to target the surrounding cells independent of the guard cells are limited. Here, we have analyzed sets of promoters for

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBrassicafoliar epidermisguard cellHordeumtissue‐specific expression

Identifiers

PMID39943924
PMCPMC11815712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.