ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025
Hypercapnia Reduces Perceived Heat Pain in Healthy Subjects.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiological and autonomic responses to intermittent low-lung-volume apnoea and pain sensitivity: A randomized controlled pilot trial.Experimental physiology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDanger signals modulate pain perception. Both amplification and attenuation of perceived pain are observed in healthy subjects exposed to danger signals, such as transient threats of an imminent electrical shock. However, exposure to danger signals in real life typically is not transient but constant over minutes to hours. Here, this was experimentally achieved by administering hypercapnic air (7.5% CO
methodsThirty-eight participants (19 women) received two air mixtures (hypercapnic and regular air) for 13 min each, during which 18 (6 × 3) noxious heat stimuli of three different intensities were applied to the calf and rated on two scales (intensity and pleasantness/unpleasantness). Psychological and physiological states were compared between conditions using the body sensations questionnaire, self-assessment manikins, heart rate, and galvanic skin response. Statistical analyses were performed using Bayesian estimation testing.
resultsBetween-condition differences were statistically meaningful for all heat intensity levels, always showing reduced pain perception during hypercapnia compared to normocapnia. The magnitude of the observed hypoalgesia did not depend on heat intensity levels.
conclusionsThe presence of a continuous physiological danger signal results in hypoalgesia. Future studies need to determine whether the present results only hold for hypercapnia in healthy subjects or are generalisable to interactions between pain perception and continuous physiological danger signals in clinical pain populations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: It was shown that hypercapnia leads to reduced perception of noxious heat stimuli. If confirmed by neural data in future studies this could help to better understand the interaction of pain perception and continuous physiological danger signals in clinical pain conditions, potentially allowing for improved treatment of affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.