Observational studyClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
D-dimer Levels in Acute, Medically Ill, Hospitalized Patients: A Large, Prospective, Multicenter Study in the United States.
Observational study in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The clinical significance of D-dimer concentrations predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with hyperemesis gravidarum.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study's main aim was to determine the prevalence of elevated D-dimer levels in adult patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses not suspected to have venous thromboembolism (VTE). The secondary aims were to determine VTE prophylaxis rates and VTE events.
methodsThis multicenter, prospective, observational study included patients who were admitted across nine US hospitals. Patients who were ≥60 years of age, admitted for an acute medical illness (nonsurgical/nontraumatic), and not suspected to have VTE (deep vein thrombosis [DVT]/pulmonary embolism [PE]) were enrolled. Current use of anticoagulation and recent major surgery were exclusion criteria. D-dimers were measured at hospital admission, and the analysis was performed at a central laboratory using the STA-Liatest D-Di test kit (Diagnostica Stago, Asnières sur Seine, France). The upper limit of normal (ULN) for D-dimer was defined as ≥500 ng/mL. Age-adjusted thresholds were calculated as age × 10 ng/mL. VTE events included symptomatic DVT (distal or proximal) or PE occurring during admission.
resultsAmong 995 patients (50.7% female; mean age, 70 ± 8 years), 74.4% (n = 740) had a D-dimer ≥ ULN, 62.2% (n = 619) had elevated age-adjusted levels, and 48.8% (n = 486) had D-dimers at least two times the ULN. The rate of VTE prophylaxis was 66.5% (n = 662); in this cohort, 1.8% (n = 18) developed a VTE.
conclusionMost hospitalized acute medically ill patients ≥60 years of age had elevated D-dimer levels on admission. Although an elevated D-dimer may be associated with VTE risk, its poor specificity indicates that it should not guide prophylaxis management without a multifactor risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.