ArticleGlobal health action2025
A multilevel analysis on the predictors of client satisfaction with family planning services in Ethiopia: evidence from the Ethiopian service provision assessment (ESPA) 2021/22.
Article in Global health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthiopia has experienced growth in the utilization of family planning services. However, there are reports of relatively low client satisfaction across the country.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess client and facility level predictors of satisfaction with family planning services in Ethiopia.
methodA multi-level mixed effects logistic regression analysis was conducted on a national survey obtained from the service provision assessment 2021-22. A total of 2071 clients (level one) and 529 facilities (level two) were included.
resultsOverall, 56% of clients were highly satisfied with the family planning service they received. Findings from the random effects of the multilevel analysis show there is a significant difference in client satisfaction between facilities, with an intra-class correlation of 0.56 in the null model. At the client-level, age above 30, auditory privacy, and discussion on side effects are significantly associated with higher client satisfaction. At the facility level, having a waiting area, facilities with a quality unit and/or committee, a DHIS2 reporting system, operating for more than 20 days a month, privately owned facilities and availability of family planning guidelines are associated with higher odds of being satisfied. On the other hand, at the client level, having a primary or higher education, increasing wait time and clients asking their providers questions are associated with lower odds of being satisfied. At the facility level, having a fixed user fee significantly reduces the odds of client satisfaction.
conclusionsHuman resource and professional development training and health system strengthening is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.