Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943736›Full record

ArticleAging cell2025

RETRACTION: Bmi-1 Plays a Critical Role in Protection From Renal Tubulointerstitial Injury by Maintaining Redox Balance.

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

retractionJ. Jin, X. Lv, L. Chen, W. Zhang, J. Li, Q. Wang, R. Wang, X. Lu, and D. Miao, "Bmi-1 Plays a Critical Role in Protection From Renal Tubulointerstitial Injury by Maintaining Redox Balance," Aging Cell 13, no. 5 (2014): 797-809, https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12236. The above article, published online on 11 June 2014, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Monty Montano; The Anatomical Society; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon following an investigation into concerns raised by a third party, which revealed image section duplications between this (Figure 3C, WT TNF-α panel) and another article that was subsequently published by an overlapping group of authors, where the image depicts different experimental details. The investigation discovered further image duplications, showing overlapping fields of view between Figure S3G Cortex and Medulla KO panels and between Figure S4C and S4D Medulla KO TNF-α and IL-6 panels. The explanation and the partial raw data shared by the authors was deemed insufficient to fully address these concerns. Thus, the editors have lost confidence in the presented data and decided to retract the article. The authors disagree with the retraction.

Identifiers

PMID39943736
PMCPMC11896473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.