Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943714›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Improving building extraction from high-resolution aerial images: Error correction and performance enhancement using deep learning on the Inria dataset.

Serdar Ekiz, Ugur Acar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serdar EkizGeomatic Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-7190
Ugur AcarGeomatic Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-4259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting buildings from images is crucial for urban management, urban planning, and post-disaster change detection. Over the years, various approaches have been tried, but the recent application of deep learning has greatly improved the success of such studies. In this study, the Inria dataset was used, consisting of 180 high-resolution aerial images.The study compared the performance of various architectures. DeepLabv3+ emerged as the most successful, with Accuracy, IoU, and F1 Scores of 96.77%, 89.85%, and 94.53%, respectively. Attention U-Net followed, scoring 95.31%, 85.49%, and 91.95%. U-Net, tested with different encoders, achieved average results of 97.22%, 84.78%, and 90.79%. SE-ResNeXt-50 was the best-performing encoder, followed by SE-ResNet-50, ResNeXt-50, and ResNet-50. UNet++ achieved 94.48% Accuracy, 83.09% IoU, and 90.45% F1 Score, while U2Net obtained 94.09%, 82.26%, and 89.88%, making them less successful.When examining the models under challenging conditions, SE-ResNeXt-50 was the most robust, successfully handling scenarios like occlusion by trees and complex indoor gardens. Conversely, Attention U-Net and UNet++ were more prone to errors, particularly when vehicles were parked near buildings or in the presence of shipping containers, where false positives were common. ResNet-50 struggled with concrete gardens, while U2Net showed better results in scenarios involving indoor gardens.These results, compared to other studies using the same dataset with different pixel sizes, show that eliminating erroneous data and resizing images can enhance the performance of deep learning networks. Therefore, by refining the data and adjusting the image sizes, models can make more accurate and efficient building detections.

Indexed as

Building detectiondeep learningInria datasetResNet-50U-Net

Identifiers

PMID39943714
PMCPMC11822834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.