Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943695›Full record

Trial reportWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the analgesic efficacy, safety and tolerability of VPX638 administered topically to painful wounds.

Jonathan Golledge, Sergio Parra, Pat M Aldons, Nicoletta Frescos, Rebecca K Iseli, Toni M Pardey, Casper F Pretorius, Omar R Shum, Paul A Yates, Cécile B Bascoul and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the analgesic efficacy, safety and tolerability of VPX638 administered topically to painful wounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jonathan GolledgeQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University and Townsville University Hospital and Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-8848
Sergio ParraVapogenix, Houston, Texas, USA.
Pat M AldonsThe Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicoletta FrescosAustin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca K IseliThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Toni M PardeyNovatrials, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Casper F PretoriusMackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
Omar R ShumWollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-4746
Paul A YatesAustin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cécile B BascoulVapogenix, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dannette K DoolittleVapogenix, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ajay A RegeVapogenix, Houston, Texas, USA.
Vaidehi J ThanawalaVapogenix, Houston, Texas, USA.
Heather GilesVapogenix, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael C WoodwardAustin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Heart Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, Townsville Hospital and Health Services JG receives research grants from these fundersVapogenix
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New analgesics are needed for painful wounds. Multiple reports suggest that topical sevoflurane may have analgesic effects. This placebo-controlled randomised trial evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of VPX638 (topical sevoflurane). Seventy-eight participants with painful wounds, were enrolled at eight Australian centres and randomly allocated to receive 2 × 5 mL of VPX638 (N = 39) or placebo (N = 40) during one wound dressing change. Numerical pain rating scores and use of opioids were recorded for 24 h. The primary endpoint was pain during wound cleaning, secondary endpoints evaluated pain for 24 h after drug application and opioids use. There was no significant difference in mean pain scores during wound cleaning between VPX638 and placebo (0.854; p = 0.23). The mean differences in summed pain intensity difference from baseline suggested VPX638 provided greater analgesia compared to placebo over 8 h (p < 0.02), 12 h (p < 0.01) and 24 h (p < 0.05) and significantly longer duration of analgesia, 24.3 h for VPX638 versus 7.1 h for placebo (p < 0.01). In the 24 h after drug administration, participants receiving VPX638 had a 50% decrease in opioid use over 24 h compared with placebo. VPX638 appeared safe and well-tolerated. In conclusion, this small placebo-controlled randomised trial suggested that VPX638 provides analgesia and is opioid-sparing for up to 24 h after wound cleaning. It supports the need for further evaluation of the benefit of VPX638 as a topical analgesic for painful wounds.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsPainWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAustraliaBandagesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Opioidanalgesiapainsevofluranetopicalwound

Identifiers

PMID39943695
PMCPMC11822243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.