ArticleIET systems biology
SeqBMC: Single-cell data processing using iterative block matrix completion algorithm based on matrix factorisation.
Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, the analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data has become the focus of current research. Matrix analysis and processing of downstream gene expression after preprocessing is a hot topic for researchers. This paper proposed an iterative block matrix completion algorithm, called SeqBMC, based on matrix factorisation. The algorithm is used to complete the missing value of the gene expression matrix caused by the defect of sequencing technology. The gene frequency of the matrix is used to block the matrix, and then the matrix factorisation algorithm is used to complete the small matrix after the block, and then the biological zeros that may exist in the block matrix are retained. Experimental results show that the matrix completion algorithm can significantly improve the classification performance of the gene expression matrix after completion with 86.81% F1 score, which is conducive to the recognition of cell types in sequencing data. Moreover, this completion method can be completed only by the machine learning method without too much prior knowledge related to biology and has good effects. Compared with ALRA, SeqBMC increased 5.47% accuracy and 5.03% F1 score. It indicates that SeqBMC has significant advantages in the matrix completion of single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.