ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Noise Resilience of Successor and Predecessor Feature Algorithms in One- and Two-Dimensional Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating Transfer Learning in Noisy Environments: A Study of Predecessor and Successor Features in Spatial Learning Using a T-Maze.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noisy inputs pose significant challenges for reinforcement learning (RL) agents navigating real-world environments. While animals demonstrate robust spatial learning under dynamic conditions, the mechanisms underlying this resilience remain understudied in RL frameworks. This paper introduces a novel comparative analysis of predecessor feature (PF) and successor feature (SF) algorithms under controlled noise conditions, revealing several insights. Our key innovation lies in demonstrating that SF algorithms achieve superior noise resilience compared to traditional approaches, with cumulative rewards of 2216.88±3.83 (mean ± SEM), even under high noise conditions (σ=0.5) in one-dimensional environments, while Q learning achieves only 19.22±0.57. In two-dimensional environments, we discover an unprecedented nonlinear relationship between noise level and algorithm performance, with SF showing optimal performance at moderate noise levels (σ=0.25), achieving cumulative rewards of 2886.03±1.63 compared to 2798.16±3.54 for Q learning. The λ parameter in PF learning is a significant factor, with λ=0.7 consistently achieving higher λ values under most noise conditions. These findings bridge computational neuroscience and RL, offering practical insights for developing noise-resistant learning systems. Our results have direct applications in robotics, autonomous navigation, and sensor-based AI systems, particularly in environments with inherent observational uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.