ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence for GNSS Multipath LSTM Training Models.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physics-Informed Hemispherical Mapping for Global Navigation Satellite System Multipath Mitigation in Mining Subsidence Monitoring.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses the critical challenge of understanding and interpreting deep learning models in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications, specifically focusing on multipath effect detection and analysis. As GNSS systems become increasingly reliant on deep learning for signal processing, the lack of model interpretability poses significant risks for safety-critical applications. We propose a novel approach combining Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) cells with Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) to create an explainable framework for multipath detection. Our key contributions include: (1) the development of an interpretable LSTM architecture for processing GNSS observables, including multipath variables, carrier-to-noise ratios, and satellite elevation angles; (2) the adaptation of the LRP technique for GNSS signal analysis, enabling attribution of model decisions to specific input features; and (3) the discovery of a correlation between LRP relevance scores and signal anomalies, leading to a new method for anomaly detection. Through systematic experimental validation, we demonstrate that our LSTM model achieves high prediction accuracy across all GNSS parameters while maintaining interpretability. A significant finding emerges from our controlled experiments: LRP relevance scores consistently increase during anomalous signal conditions, with growth rates varying from 7.34% to 32.48% depending on the feature type. In our validation experiments, we systematically introduced signal anomalies in specific time segments of the data sequence and observed corresponding increases in LRP scores: multipath parameters showed increases of 7.34-8.81%, carrier-to-noise ratios exhibited changes of 12.50-32.48%, and elevation angle parameters increased by 16.10%. These results demonstrate the potential of LRP-based analysis for enhancing GNSS signal quality monitoring and integrity assessment. Our approach not only improves the interpretability of deep learning models in GNSS applications but also provides a practical framework for detecting and analyzing signal anomalies, contributing to the development of more reliable and trustworthy navigation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.