ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving 3D Reconstruction Through RGB-D Sensor Noise Modeling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive Peen Forming: Sensing Architectures, Learning Models, and Closed-Loop Smart Manufacturing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Edge-Point Cloud Fusion for Geometric Fitting of Cylinder Parameters Using Single-View RGB-D Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SGDO-SLAM: A Semantic RGB-D SLAM System with Coarse-to-Fine Dynamic Rejection and Static Weighted Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-resolution RGB-D sensors are widely used in computer vision, manufacturing, and robotics. The depth maps from these sensors have inherently high measurement uncertainty that includes both systematic and non-systematic noise. These noisy depth estimates degrade the quality of scans, resulting in less accurate 3D reconstruction, making them unsuitable for some high-precision applications. In this paper, we focus on quantifying the uncertainty in the depth maps of high-resolution RGB-D sensors for the purpose of improving 3D reconstruction accuracy. To this end, we estimate the noise model for a recent high-precision RGB-D structured light sensor called Zivid when mounted on a robot arm. Our proposed noise model takes into account the measurement distance and angle between the sensor and the measured surface. We additionally analyze the effect of background light, exposure time, and the number of captures on the quality of the depth maps obtained. Our noise model seamlessly integrates with well-known classical and modern neural rendering-based algorithms, from KinectFusion to Point-SLAM methods using bilinear interpolation as well as 3D analytical functions. We collect a high-resolution RGB-D dataset and apply our noise model to improve tracking and produce higher-resolution 3D models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.