ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Open-Source Algorithm for Automated Vigilance State Classification Using Single-Channel Electroencephalogram in Rodents.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- REST-a deep learning tool for automated mouse sleep stage classification.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of sleep stages is essential for understanding sleep physiology and its role in neurological and behavioral research. Manual scoring of polysomnographic data, while reliable, is time-intensive and prone to variability. This study presents a novel Python-based algorithm for automated vigilance state scoring using single-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings from rats and mice. The algorithm employs artifact processing, multi-band frequency analysis, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based clustering to classify wakefulness, non-rapid, and rapid eye movement sleep (NREM and REM sleep, respectively). Combining narrow and broad frequency bands across the delta, theta, and sigma ranges, it uses a majority voting system to enhance accuracy, with tailored preprocessing and voting criteria improving REM detection. Validation on datasets from 10 rats and 10 mice under standard conditions showed sleep-wake state detection accuracies of 92% and 93%, respectively, closely matching manual scoring and comparable to existing methods. REM sleep detection accuracies of 89% (mice) and 91% (rats) align with previously reported (85-90%). Processing a full day of EEG data within several minutes, the algorithm is advantageous for large-scale and longitudinal studies. Its open-source design, flexibility, and scalability make it a robust, efficient tool for automated rodent sleep scoring, advancing research in standard experimental conditions, including aging and sleep deprivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.