ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Adaptive Grasp Pose Optimization for Robotic Arms Using Low-Cost Depth Sensors in Complex Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Time Target-Oriented Grasping Framework for Resource-Constrained Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents an efficient grasp pose estimation algorithm for robotic arm systems with a two-finger parallel gripper and a consumer-grade depth camera. Unlike traditional deep learning methods, which suffer from high data dependency and inefficiency with low-precision point clouds, the proposed approach uses ellipsoidal modeling to overcome these issues. The algorithm segments the target and then applies a three-stage optimization to refine the grasping path. Initial estimation fits an ellipsoid to determine principal axes, followed by nonlinear optimization for a six-degree-of-freedom grasp pose. Validation through simulations and experiments showed a target grasp success rate (TGSR) of over 83% under low noise, with only a 4.9% drop under high noise-representing a 68.0% and a 42.4% improvement over GPD and PointNetGPD, respectively. In real-world tests, success rates ranged from 95 to 100%, and the computational efficiency was improved by 56.3% compared to deep learning methods, proving its practicality for real-time applications. These results demonstrate stable and reliable grasping performance, even in noisy environments and with low-cost sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.