Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943512›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Development of Air Quality Monitoring Systems: Balancing Infrastructure Investment and User Satisfaction Policies.

Olga Sokolova, Anastasia Yurgenson, Vladimir Shakhov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga SokolovaThe Artificial Intelligence Research Center of Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0102-8411
Anastasia YurgensonThe Artificial Intelligence Research Center of Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vladimir ShakhovInstitute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.

Funding

This research was funded by Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation in accordance with the subsidy agreement (agreement identifier 000000D730324P540002) and the agreement with the Novosibirsk State University dated December 27, 2023 No. 70-2023- 001318.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air quality monitoring is a critical aspect of urban management. While poor air quality negatively impacts public health and well-being, implementing effective monitoring systems often involves significant costs. This paper addresses the optimization of air quality monitoring systems by balancing cost-effectiveness with citizen satisfaction. The core objective is to identify an optimal trade-off between user satisfaction and budgetary constraints. To achieve this, we optimize the number of clusters, where each cluster represents a group of users served by the nearest air quality sensor. Additionally, we present a penalty function that emphasizes prompt air pollution warnings, facilitating preventive actions to reduce exposure to polluted areas while ensuring a cost-effective solution. This approach enables the formulation of well-founded performance requirements for AI-driven algorithms tasked with analyzing air quality data. The findings contribute to the development of efficient, user-centric air quality monitoring systems, highlighting the delicate balance between infrastructure investment, AI algorithm efficiency, and user satisfaction.

Indexed as

air pollution detectionair pollution monitoringair qualityartificial intelligencecluster number optimizationenvironmental monitoringLambert W functionsensorssmart city

Identifiers

PMID39943512
PMCPMC11819879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.