ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Center of Mass Estimation During Single-Leg Standing Using a Force Platform and Inertial Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Properties of standing balance control under noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-leg standing is a conventional balance evaluation method used in medicine. Although the center of mass (COM) displacement should be evaluated to determine balance quality, no practical COM estimation methods have been developed for single-leg standing. This study aimed to estimate the COM displacement in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions during single-leg standing using practical measurements. We used a force platform and three inertial measurement units to estimate the COM displacement based on rigid-link models in the sagittal and frontal planes. The rigid-link models were composed of the stance leg, upper body, and non-stance leg. Seven healthy male subjects participated in the experiment to validate the estimation accuracy. The COM estimation accuracy was verified by comparison with measurements obtained using an optical motion capture system. The root mean square error of this method was 1.18 mm in the sagittal plane and 1.26 mm in the frontal plane. This technique will contribute to the detailed evaluation of individual balance abilities in the medical and sports fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.