ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Intrusion Detection System over the IoT Data Streams Using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable AI-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Environments: A Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Explainable Intrusion and Anomaly Detection for IoT Sensor Networks Using Hybrid Feature Selection and Deep Autoencoder Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Architectures, Datasets, and Emerging Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Explainable XGBoost-Based Framework for IoT Attack Detection with Unseen Attack Family Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Graph Convolution Neural Network and Deep Q-Network Optimization-Based Intrusion Detection with Explainability Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid AI Intrusion Detection: Balancing Accuracy and Efficiency.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantum-aware secure blockchain intrusion detection system for industrial IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- FORT-IDS: a federated, optimized, robust and trustworthy intrusion detection system for IIoT security.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced intrusion detection in cybersecurity through dimensionality reduction and explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- X-FuseRLSTM: A Cross-Domain Explainable Intrusion Detection Framework in IoT Using the Attention-Guided Dual-Path Feature Fusion and Residual LSTM.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise in intrusions on network and IoT systems has led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies in intrusion detection systems (IDSs). However, traditional AI or machine learning (ML) methods can compromise accuracy due to the vast, diverse, and dynamic nature of the data generated. Moreover, many of these methods lack transparency, making it challenging for security professionals to make predictions. To address these challenges, this paper presents a novel IDS architecture that uses deep learning (DL)-based methodology along with eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques to create explainable models in network intrusion detection systems, empowering security analysts to use these models effectively. DL models are needed to train enormous amounts of data and produce promising results. Three different DL models, i.e., customized 1-D convolutional neural networks (1-D CNNs), deep neural networks (DNNs), and pre-trained model TabNet, are proposed. The experiments are performed on seven different datasets of TON_IOT. The CNN model for the network dataset achieves an impressive accuracy of 99.24%. Meanwhile, for the six different IoT datasets, in most of the datasets, the CNN and DNN achieve 100% accuracy, further validating the effectiveness of the proposed models. In all the datasets, the least-performing model is TabNet. Implementing the proposed method in real time requires an explanation of the predictions generated. Thus, the XAI methods are implemented to understand the essential features responsible for predicting the particular class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.