ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards an Energy Consumption Index for Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Analysis of Architectures, GPUs, and Measurement Tools.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Terrain Recognition for Quadruped Robots Using Proprioceptive Sensors and Temporal Convolutional Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A novel quantum convolutional neural network framework for quantum-enhanced classification of pixelated colour images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Benchmark evaluation of deepseek AI models in antibacterial clinical decision-making for infectious diseases.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Cloud-edge-device collaborative computing in smart agriculture: architectures, applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing global demand for computational resources, particularly in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, raises increasing concerns about energy consumption and its environmental impact. This study introduces a newly developed energy consumption index that evaluates the energy efficiency of Deep Learning (DL) models, providing a standardized and adaptable approach for various models. Convolutional neural networks, including both classical and modern architectures, serve as the primary case study to demonstrate the applicability of the index. Furthermore, the inclusion of the Swin Transformer, a state-of-the-art and modern non-convolutional model, highlights the adaptability of the framework to diverse architectural paradigms. This study analyzes the energy consumption during both training and inference of representative DL architectures, including AlexNet, ResNet18, VGG16, EfficientNet-B3, ConvNeXt-T, and Swin Transformer, trained on the Imagenette dataset using TITAN XP and GTX 1080 GPUs. Energy measurements are obtained using sensor-based tools, including OpenZmeter (v2) with integrated electrical sensors. Additionally, software-based tools such as CarbonTracker (v1.2.5) and CodeCarbon (v2.4.1) retrieve energy consumption data from computational component sensors. The results reveal significant differences in energy efficiency across architectures and GPUs, providing insights into the trade-offs between model performance and energy use. By offering a flexible framework for comparing energy efficiency across DL models, this study advances sustainability in AI systems, supporting accurate and standardized energy evaluations applicable to various computational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.