ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Precision Soil Moisture Monitoring Through Drone-Based Hyperspectral Imaging and PCA-Driven Machine Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel indices and multi-source data fusion for monitoring plant moisture stress in winter wheat fields.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based evaluation of seed priming and biostimulant applications in rainfed wheat.PeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately estimating soil moisture at multiple depths is essential for sustainable farming practices, as it supports efficient irrigation management, optimizes crop yields, and conserves water resources. This study integrates a drone-mounted hyperspectral sensor with machine learning techniques to enhance soil moisture estimation at 10 cm and 30 cm depths in a cornfield. The primary aim was to understand the relationship between root zone water content and canopy reflectance, pinpoint the depths where this relationship is most significant, identify the most informative wavelengths, and train a machine learning model using those wavelengths to estimate soil moisture. Our results demonstrate that PCA effectively detected critical variables for soil moisture estimation, with the ANN model outperforming other machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Model comparisons between irrigated and non-irrigated treatments showed that soil moisture in non-irrigated plots could be estimated with greater accuracy across various dates. This finding indicates that plants experiencing high water stress exhibit more significant spectral variability in their canopy, enhancing the correlation with soil moisture in the root zone. Moreover, over the growing season, when corn exhibits high chlorophyll content and increased resilience to environmental stressors, the correlation between canopy spectrum and root zone soil moisture weakens. Error analysis revealed the lowest relative estimation errors in non-irrigated plots at a 30 cm depth, aligning with periods of elevated water stress at shallower levels, which drove deeper root growth and strengthened the canopy reflectance relationship. This correlation corresponded to lower RMSE values, highlighting improved model accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.