ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Novel YOLOv10-Based Algorithm for Accurate Steel Surface Defect Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CCP-YOLO: An Improved YOLOv11n Algorithm for Steel Surface Defect Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lightweight Visual Localization of Steel Surface Defects for Autonomous Inspection Robots Based on Improved YOLOv10n.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Model-Centric or Data-Centric Approach? A Case Study on the Classification of Surface Defects in Steel Hot Rolling Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on Drought Stress Detection in the Seedling Stage of Yunnan Large-Leaf Tea Plants Based on Biomimetic Vision and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimizing surface defect detection with YOLOv9: the role of advanced backbone models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Machine vision-based detection method for key phenotypic information of shiitake mushroom stipes.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address challenges like manual processes, complicated detection methods, high false alarm rates, and frequent errors in identifying defects on steel surfaces, this research presents an innovative detection system, YOLOv10n-SFDC. The study focuses on the complex dependencies between parameters used for defect detection, particularly the interplay between feature extraction, fusion, and bounding box regression, which often leads to inefficiencies in traditional methods. YOLOv10n-SFDC incorporates advanced elements such as the DualConv module, SlimFusionCSP module, and Shape-IoU loss function, improving feature extraction, fusion, and bounding box regression to enhance accuracy. Testing on the NEU-DET dataset shows that YOLOv10n-SFDC achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 85.5% at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.5, a 6.3 percentage point improvement over the baseline YOLOv10. The system uses only 2.67 million parameters, demonstrating efficiency. It excels in identifying complex defects like 'rolled in scale' and 'inclusion'. Compared to SSD and Fast R-CNN, YOLOv10n-SFDC outperforms these models in accuracy while maintaining a lightweight architecture. This system excels in automated inspection for industrial environments, offering rapid, precise defect detection. YOLOv10n-SFDC emerges as a reliable solution for the continuous monitoring and quality assurance of steel surfaces, improving the reliability and efficiency of steel manufacturing processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.